Logo

0
Your cart is empty empty bag

Free Delivery Worldwide on orders over $50

Х

Parliamentary Democracy in North-East India: A Study of Two Communities Each from the States of Assam, Meghalaya and Sikkim

 
Jayanti Alam (Author)
Synopsis

As mentioned in the beginning of the “Acknowledgement”, I found a general absence of political sense in the tribes of North-east India when I was conducting extensive and intensive field study to understand the socio-cultural characteristics of the Buddhist tribes of Arunachal Pradesh and Sikkim. (I had earlier studied a similar aspect amongst the Tibetans in India—both refugees and traditional settlers, who had come as traders many centuries back and become Indian citizens). These tribal communities are vehemently conscious of their language, culture and way of life and their “politics” is fighting for those basic rights from both the State governments and the Government of India. We are fully aware of the long-term struggle of the Bodos and the Karbis of Assam. They, unlike the Ahoms or the Bengalis or any other language group of India, are least bothered about problems of India as such, not even if and when Pakistan or China attacks India! They only want their very special identity established. I took up Meghalaya and Sikkim out of the seven sisters of the North-east because their political systems and the awareness amongst the electors and the elected both appeared diametrically opposite! There was no Opposition in Sikkim Assembly (till the recent 2014 election) and no single majority party (again till the recent election) in Meghalaya! The government was of coalition and the Opposition too, was of coalition! In Sikkim the voters appeared so very fully contended with Pawan Chamling as the Chief Minister that they could not think of any other party other than SDF. The deep anti-Congressism (which had sprung up due to Congress Party's role in annexing Sikkim to the Indian Union when the common people were quite contended with the utterly benevolent monarch) had also made Sikkim Democratic Front utterly popular. In Meghalaya no party or no leader appeared to be above board thus leaving the voters totally confused. So, they mostly voted for the leader they personally liked ! There was no political consideration. The vote-seekers too, had no specific or attractive agenda that could possibly mobilize the voters successfully. They were unhappy with whichever coalition that came to power without realizing that too many cooks spoil the broth! They lacked the political sense to realize that a steady government can possibly indulge into some developmental activity. The parties and the leaders too, had no specific manifesto. Thus parliamentary type of democracy was missing in all the States I studied. It is for my readers to find out where they went wrong and where I went wrong!.

Read more
59.40 53.46 $ 66.00 $
Free delivery Wolrdwidе in 10-18 days Ships in 1-2 days from New Delhi Membership for 1 Year $35.00
Get it now and save 10%
Members SAVE 10% every day
BECOME A MEMBER
About the author

Jayanti Alam

Jayanti Alam is an independent scholar and activist, of women and children and other deprived groups of our society. She has been working ‘for’ them through her writings, and ‘with’ them on the roads and in their habitats. She has also made a deep study of Tibetan society and also written an other book “Tibetan Society in Exile.” She has got many articles on women’s work, migration, effects of globalisation, child labour, human rights, etc. published in various journals, newspapers and edited books. She has presented papers in national and international seminars.

Write a review
Reviews in total
 

Bibliographic information

Title Parliamentary Democracy in North-East India: A Study of Two Communities Each from the States of Assam, Meghalaya and Sikkim
Author Jayanti Alam
Format Hardcover
Date published: 14.06.2016
Edition 1st. ed.
Language: English
isbn 9789351281610
length 281p., 22cm.